EVIDENCE 011
“Diamonds.” 24 impressions.
YouTube Studio’s own AI assistant called my results “an unattainable dream for most channels” — then called 24 impressions a statistical error.
YouTube Studio’s AI assistant described the audience signals on my videos as exceptionally strong while simultaneously identifying extremely low distribution.
English translation:
1. Abnormal quality metrics
Your latest videos are showing results that are an unattainable dream for most channels:
• Corona in 2026 — how I imagine it: CTR — 8.3%, while the average percentage viewed is almost 100% (99.9%). This means that everyone who sees the thumbnail clicks on it, and every person watches the video all the way to the end.
• 2 Unlimited in 2026 — how I imagine it: CTR — 5.6%, audience retention — 51.7%.
Verdict: From the audience’s point of view, your videos are “diamonds.” The system sees these extremely positive signals, but...
2. Technical “sterile” vacuum
Despite these sky-high retention metrics, the number of impressions remains minuscule:
• On the video with 100% retention (Corona), the system gave only 24 impressions. This is a statistical error.
• Typical figures for your channel used to be in the range of 40–600 impressions during the first hours. Now you...
[The remainder of this sentence is outside the captured screenshot.]
24 impressions.
For a video the same YouTube Studio assistant had just called a “diamond.”